zaterdag 20 juli 2013

Evolution or Creation? That's a NO BRAINER!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yTmKNyagh64

Evolution or Creation? That's a NO BRAINER! Carl Gallups Explains in this Amazing Video 

 

79 opmerkingen:

  1. Abiogenesis is a good example of how outlandish scientific ideas can get. As is common with scientific attempts to explain the origin of life they usually get discarded once true scientists find their flaws or when they realize that it is absolutely impossible for science to find the origin of life. What most scientists do not realize, or simply ignore, is that those questions belong to the world of philosophy.
    ·

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    It is also a good example of science, especially evolutionary science, largely being based on, and led by, assumptions primarily based on preconceived belief. Darwin caused much trouble for evolutionists with his book 'The Origin of Species' whose title by far overestimates its premise.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    But that is common in the world of evolution and science. It clearly understates the metaphysical foundation of most evolutionary theories, the need to explain everything by means of naturalistic processes. This is also one of the reasons why evolution is regarded by many as (closely) related to religion.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Wikipedia - Biogenesis

    Biogenesis is the production of new living organisms. The law of biogenesis, attributed to Louis Pasteur, is the observation that living things come only from other living things, by reproduction (e.g. a spider lays eggs, which develop into spiders). That is, life does not arise from non-living material, which was the position held by spontaneous generation.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    How could something as complex as a first cell arise from [dead] matter, energy, and a mindless process like evolution?

    Wikipedia - Cell (biology)

    The cell is the basic structural and functional unit of all known living organisms. It is the smallest unit of life that is classified as a living thing (except virus...), and is often called the building block of life.

    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    From the beginning of the history of evolutionary thought and evolutionary science spontaneous generation has been a belief of naturalists who eagerly wanted to explain the coming into existence of life by means of evolutionary processes driven by chance and time acting upon [dead] matter and energy. Undoubtedly, they tried very hard, but none of them succeeded...
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Wikipedia - Abiogenesis

    And then a miracle happens Until the 19th century people believed in spontaneous generation; the ongoing spontaneous generation of certain forms of life from non-living matter.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden


    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  2. This was paired with the belief in heterogenesis, i.e. that one form of life derived from a different form (e.g. bees from flowers). By the middle of the 19th century, the theory of biogenesis had accumulated so much evidential support, due to the work of Louis Pasteur and others, that the alternative theory of spontaneous generation had been effectively disproven.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Pasteur himself remarked, after a definitive finding in 1864, "Never will the doctrine of spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow struck by this simple experiment."

    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    In his The Origin of Life, Alexander Oparin proposed that the "spontaneous generation of life" that had been attacked by Louis Pasteur did in fact occur once, but was now impossible because the conditions found on the early Earth had changed, and preexisting organisms would immediately consume any spontaneously generated organism. Oparin argued that a "primeval soup" of organic molecules (abiogenesis) could be created in an oxygenless atmosphere through the action of sunlight.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    Oparin proposed that the "spontaneous generation of life" that had been disproven by Louis Pasteur did "in fact" occur once. This is of course a very clever statement knowing that the universe had a beginning with the Big Bang. It is also the bottleneck for the naturalistic atheist. Simply because he has to explain the first living cell by means of naturalistic processes. This has led to some of the the wildest theories to date...
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    it inevitably forces the evolutionary scientists to make up just-so stories to fit with the evolutionary belief system.

    SOURCE (Google); Evolution? - Bas Feijen

    Abiogenesis
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  3. Twice the word c*nt in one post.

    Who else is using this word so (too) much?

    Hans S in reactie op stratovani (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  4. Isaac Newton: How came the bodies of animals to be contrived with so much art, and for what ends were their several parts? Was the eye contrived without skill in Optics, and the ear without knowledge of sounds?...and these things being rightly dispatched, does it not appear from phenomena that there is a Being incorporeal, living, intelligent...?
    · in reactie op bluebottle99 (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    When it comes to explaining intelligence evolution is of course in a difficult position. It is noteworthy that science itself can never account for any explanation that involves subjects like intelligence. Intelligence logically does not consist of matter, it’s a mental capability. Unfortunately for evolutionists, intelligence can not be denied, it is a fact, and without it there wouldn’t even be any science or evolution theory.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    Wikipedia - Intelligence

    Intelligence has been defined in many different ways including, but not limited to, abstract thought, understanding, self-awareness, communication, reasoning, learning, having emotional knowledge, retaining, planning, and problem solving. The definition of intelligence is controversial. Groups of scientists have stated the following: From "Mainstream Science on Intelligence" (1994), an editorial statement by fifty-two researchers:
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    A very general mental capability that, among other things, involves the ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly and learn from experience. It is not merely book learning, a narrow academic skill, or test-taking smarts. Rather, it reflects a broader and deeper capability for comprehending our surroundings - "catching on," "making sense" of things, or "figuring out" what to do.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    Wikipedia - Evolution of human intelligence

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  5. The evolution of human intelligence refers to a set of theories that attempt to explain how human intelligence has evolved. These theories are closely tied to the evolution of the human brain and to the emergence of human language. The great apes show considerable abilities for cognition and empathy. Chimpanzees make tools and use them to acquire foods and for social displays;
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 3 seconden geleden

    they have sophisticated hunting strategies requiring cooperation, influence and rank; they are status conscious, manipulative and capable of deception; they can learn to use symbols and understand aspects of human language including some relational syntax, concepts of number and numerical sequence. In one study, young chimpanzees outperformed human college students in tasks requiring remembering numbers.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    This claim was refuted in a later study after it was noted that the chimpanzees had received extensive practice with the task while the students were evaluated on their first attempt.

    Evolutionists have no sensible explanations for these kind of phenomena. The fact that they use a materialistic method for explaining a mental capability is logically very suspicious.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    Phenomena like intelligence belong to psychology or philosophy. So here we see that evolutionists try to explain phenomena that fall outside the limits of science. They already failed miserably with evolutionary psychology. This indicates that mainstream science, runned by evolutionists, is trying to incorporate fields related to the human mind. Why would evolutionists want to add such fields to their curriculum? Isn't science by definition limited to materialism only?

    Evolution? - Bas Feijen
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  6. >>Whiteoakdruidry

    Bas Feijen is a registered child rapist,and Barbie--you murdered your little girl in an abortion.I think you work at a clinic,killing them one by one.<<

    You tend to delete your posts, and that's why I quote them, so that others can evaluate your raving madness.

    This 'debate' isn't about evolution vs creation, but about dishonesty vs honesty.

    Evolutionists are trapped in their lies and Satan controls them.

    Hans S in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  7. Evolution is a satanic attempt to whittle away the reason why creation isn't perfect at the moment, and why it seems to be originated from nothing, without a purpose and meaning.

    This is the reason for the current imperfect state of creation;

    Genesis 3:9-19

    9 YHVH God called to the man, and said to him, “Where are you?”

    10 The man said, “I heard your voice in the garden, and I was afraid, because I was naked; and I hid myself.”
    ·
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    11 God said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten from the tree that I commanded you not to eat from?”

    12 The man said, “The woman whom you gave to be with me, she gave me of the tree, and I ate.”

    13 YHVH God said to the woman, “What is this you have done?”

    The woman said, “The serpent deceived me, and I ate.”
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    14 YHVH God said to the serpent, “Because you have done this, cursed are you above all cattle, and above every animal of the field. On your belly shall you go, and you shall eat dust all the days of your life. 15 I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and her offspring. He will bruise your head, and you will bruise his heel.”
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    16 To the woman he said, “I will greatly multiply your pain in childbirth. In pain you will bring forth children. Your desire will be for your husband, and he will rule over you.”
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 3 minuten geleden

    >>Whiteoakdruidry

    Bas Feijen is a registered child rapist,and Barbie--you murdered your little girl in an abortion.I think you work at a clinic,killing them one by one.<<

    You tend to delete your posts, and that's why I quote them, so that others can evaluate your raving madness.

    This 'debate' isn't about evolution vs creation, but about dishonesty vs honesty.

    Evolutionists are trapped in their lies and Satan controls them.
    · in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    17 To Adam he said, “Because you have listened to your wife’s voice, and have eaten of the tree, of which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat of it,’ cursed is the ground for your sake. In toil you will eat of it all the days of your life. 18 Thorns also and thistles will it bring forth to you; and you will eat the herb of the field. 19 By the sweat of your face will you eat bread until you return to the ground, for out of it you were taken.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    For you are dust, and to dust you shall return.”

    Based on World English Bible (I've changed Yahweh into YHVH=the abbreviation for God's name=I am, that I am)
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  8. I agree, because when people are possessed by evil spirits, you're not communicating with them, but with demons, and demons always lie and curse, or they try to be nice in order to deceive.

    I'm really glad you believe in God-Jesus-the Bible-creation, but please go one step further and quit being a Roman Catholic and be a follower of JESUS Christ only.

    · in reactie op Shynn Sup (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Please inform yourself and watch

    Satanic Vatican - Full Length watch?v=-aD8TU3VC-Q

    I know this is very confronting, but realise that I'm from a Roman Catholic mother, and she's still trapped in this religious upbringing, and she believes in God and 'our dear Lord Jesus', but she NOT born again yet, and I hope and pray she'll be saved before she dies, for she's just become 85.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    I have Roman Catholic family members and I pray for them all that they will discover the REAL Jesus Christ of the Bible, and I don't recommend a Catholic Bible, but the King James version, or the World English Bible, because the Roman Catholic Bible has been tampered with.

    God-JESUS loves you, and realise He's the God of the old- and the New Testament who became a human being in the person of the JEWISH Yeshua ha Mashiach, know in English as Jesus (the) Christ.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    Be a follower of JESUS Christ and NOT of people like the pope of Rome.

    The Pope is NOT your master; Jesus wants to be your master, your teacher, your Lord and Savior and your BEST friend and the only way to the Father.

    I bless you in making the right decision.

    Hans from the Netherlands
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  9. >>Whiteoakdruidry

    Hans/Barbie,you are a paranoid schizo
    ,and a baby killer,which not only goes against catholic teachings,but Wiccan teachings as well,and all of those who honor the sanctity of life,and you committed murder,and your boyfriend an accomplice to murder by taking you there to slaughter your baby.How arrogant and hateful you are to kill a baby[girl] and expect no consequences.<<

    Okay, enough of this GARBAGE in JESUS name!

    I've told you before and I tell you again;
    · in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    You're LOST without Jesus Christ!

    REPENT!
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  10. Prove it by renouncing the Roman Catholic CULT.

    Realise that God is asking this from us; And upon her forehead was a name written, MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH. Revelation 17,5

    This verse refers to the Roman Catholic church!

    · in reactie op Shynn Sup (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    And I heard another voice from heaven, saying, Come out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues. 5 For her sins have reached unto heaven, and God hath remembered her iniquities.

    Revelation 18:4-5 KJV

    'her' is MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH.

    Referring to the Roman Catholic church!
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  11. bluebottle99, you've been drinking too much from your bluebottle.

    Evolution is impossible.

    Get over it, repent or go to hell...it's as simple as that.

    Satan hates you, JESUS loves you.

    Hans S in reactie op bluebottle99 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen


  12. Shynn Sup, I'm not able to convince you
    ; only the Holy Spirit (=JESUS in spiritual capacity) can.

    But google (the images too); MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH

    and investigate

    Hans S in reply to Shynn Sup (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  13. 'My' JESUS Christ is a JEW and He has absolutely NOTHING! to do with the 'church of Rome', and I'm NOT a 'christian' because many people call themselves 'christians' while they're not; I am a worshipper or a follower of Jesus Christ.

    Hans S in reply to MISTERWHITE111 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  14. Jesus Christ is the God of Israel, and His name means I AM SALVATION.

    God's name is I AM, and JESUS is God in the role of Savior.

    The Roman Catholic 'church' is the smokescreen for the Roman Empire, and it will produce the antichrist and the false prophet.

    · in reply to MISTERWHITE111 (Show the comment)

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 second ago

    In the past it produced people like Hitler, Mussolini, Franco, Stalin (he as a Jesuit) and even Mao Zedong, but also American presidents, and 'the Statue of Liberty' depicts LUCIFER, and 'Obama' serves the Vatican.

    The EU's flag is the Roman Catholic blue MARIA-flag with twelve stars.

    Be informed;

    one-evil.org

    vatican assassins

    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
    Reacties
    1. Stalin (he as a Jesuit)=Stalin (he was a Jesuit)

      Verwijderen
  15. You want proof of hell?

    Wait until you die!

    But this is unnecessary, because just ask Jesus-God for hellish experiences and be sure you're SERIOUS!

    But of course it's much better to surrender to Jesus Christ right now.

    There's of course only ONE Jesus Christ; the ONLY human being who rose from the dead and who stayed alive forevermore.

    Jesus Christ is NOT an illegal Mexican immigrant.

    Hans S in reply to MISTERWHITE111 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  16. Well, it's YOU who wanted proof for the existence of hell and Satan.

    When I listen to you, I'm getting an abundance of proof, because you're quite satanic.

    You want Satan?

    Here; Obama Antichrist Rob Zombie -- Super Beast remix

    watch?v=yIYYIG1V4UA

    Hans S in reply to MISTERWHITE111 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  17. Wikipedia and the many articles on the internet about so-called missing links that prove macroevolution are a good indication for what kind of evolutionary bias is spread in the media. Speculation and assumptions are common in the world of evolution and mainstream science. The propaganda says: “We found the missing link!” Here follows a typical example of this...

    Sky News - Scientists Unveil Missing Link In Evolution
    ·

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 second ago

    Missing Link The discovery of the 95%-complete 'lemur monkey' - dubbed Ida - is described by experts as the "eighth wonder of the world". They say its impact on the world of palaeontology will be "somewhat like an asteroid falling down to Earth".

    Researchers say proof of this transitional species finally confirms Charles Darwin's theory of evolution, and the then radical, outlandish ideas he came up with during his time aboard the Beagle.
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 second ago

    Sir David Attenborough said Darwin "would have been thrilled" to have seen the fossil - and says it tells us who we are and where we came from. "This little creature is going to show us our connection with the rest of the mammals," he said. "This is the one that connects us directly with them. "Now people can say 'okay we are primates, show us the link'. "The link they would have said up to now is missing - well it's no longer missing."
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    This is striking. Such propaganda articles are often filled with metaphysical statements and obvious religious undertones. This is the bolstering of a belief, not of any science because true science is simply not applicable to these statements. Statements like "it tells us who we are and where we come from" are too silly to comment. It's religion.

    Evolution? - Bas Feijen

    Missing Links & Transitional Fossils
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  18. I renounce Satan and his stupid system of religions like Roman catholicism, islam, hinduism etc. in the name and the authority of JESUS Christ!

    Hans S in reply to MISTERWHITE111 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  19. It's a good idea to quote from (google) Evolution? - Bas Feijen

    h t t p : / / w w w. basfeijen.nl /evolution

    because his articles are excellent.

    Hans S in reply to mdace34 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  20. Hush and listen to this; Stryper - From Wrong to Right (1984) watch?v=SqhPVWPllY4

    Satan, evilution and witchcraft is for losers.

    Choose the winner; JESUS CHRIST and He loves you;

    When you surrender to Him, He will reward you with His riches and love, and when you reject Him, He still loves you, but then you'll have to go to 'eternal rehab in hell', because He doesn't want you to spoil His eternal wedding party.

    What will you do witchy WO MAN?

    Hans S in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  21. Shut up Satan, in JESUS' name! I wasn't talking to you, but to "Whiteoakdruidry"

    Hans S in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  22. Anything else?

    There is no evolution, so accept the FACT of creation, or remain stupid.

    Hans S in reactie op hju150 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  23. Yes, but the question is where did the pig come from; is it a result of evolution or creation?

    What's your opinion on this important issue?

    In the meantime you may listen to this; All Creation Worships You

    watch?v=BNIv1MIXlj8

    Hans S in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  24. And it goes like this; 'in the beginning there was a huge explosion...because the witch of evocration was a suicide bomber'

    Hans S in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  25. practically all complex life froms as we know them today require sex to procreate. How did chance mutations, natural selection, or any other mindless evolutionary proces make that happen? To believe it happened by chance, in an imaginary timespan of millions or billions of years, another unproven assumption by the way, just shows how deluded and unscientific a religion like evolution can become.
    · in reactie op tskasa1 (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    It shows how intelligent people can believe in unintelligent nonsense claiming that there was no intelligence involved in the coming into existence of life. According to such people the mindless gods called Blind Chance and Evolution simply did it.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Many of them often blame other people for using God-of-the-gaps arguments while they themselves make use of evolution-of-the-gaps arguments. It's ignorance and arrogance again coming from boastful minds who think they will explain the origin of life by means of their self-invented theories based on insurmountable assumptions.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Many say evolution is a fact, but they have no reasonable clue for explaining what happened and how it happened as is also evidenced by the countless just-so-stories conforming to the blind faith in the evolution fairy tale. This clearly understates the fact that people will always need the so-called God-of-the-gaps for explaining the many miracles that had to have happened for the fine-tuned universe and life to come into existence.

    Chance... another Evolution-of-the-gaps argument - Bas Feijen
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  26. Scientists use methods based on uniformitarianism to define the age of things. It is important to realize that these methods are largely useless if the Earth has not always been a constant. Evolutionists base their evolutionary tree, the evolutionary history of life on Earth, and the earth itself on the idea that uniformitarianism is a "fact".
    · in reactie op tskasa1 (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    This forms part of their circular reasoning since nobody can give any certainty about the assumptions. This also clearly shows the level of faith put into their theory, a theory of which they claim it is a "fact". There are even bold scientists who claim to have calculated the age of the universe. As if anyone knows how it happened. We now know of the assumptions, but how trustworthy are those calculations? And how do they relate to true science?

    Evolution? - Radiometric dating - Bas Feijen
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Wikipedia - Radiometric dating

    Radiometric dating is a technique used to date materials such as rocks, usually based on a comparison between the observed abundance of a naturally occurring radioactive isotope and its decay products, using known decay rates. It is the principal source of information about the absolute age of rocks and other geological features, including the age of the Earth itself, and can be used to date a wide range of natural and man-made materials.

    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    While the moment in time at which a particular nucleus decays is unpredictable, a collection of atoms of a radioactive nuclide decays exponentially at a rate described by a parameter known as the half-life.

    The basic equation of radiometric dating requires that neither the parent nuclide nor the daughter product can enter or leave the material after its formation.

    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    The precision of a dating method depends in part on the half-life of the radioactive isotope involved. For instance, carbon-14 has a half-life of 5,730 years. After an organism has been dead for 60,000 years so little carbon-14 is left that accurate dating can not be established. On the other hand, the concentration of carbon-14 falls off so steeply that the age of relatively young remains can be determined precisely to within a few decades.

    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    That's very nice but how reliable are the results of this method? What are the assumptions necessary for determining the age of things that can not be observed directly and of which people have no other knowledge?

    Wikipedia - Radiocarbon dating

    Willard Frank Libby's original exchange reservoir hypothesis assumes that the exchange reservoir is constant all over the world.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    The calibration method also assumes that the temporal variation in 14C level is global, such that a small number of samples from a specific year are sufficient for calibration. However, since Libby's early work was published (1950 to 1958), latitudinal and continental variations in the carbon exchange reservoir have been observed.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  27. Before 1958 scientists believed that radiocarbon dating was accurate.

    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Wikipedia - Hessel de Vries

    In 1958, Hessel de Vries showed that baffling anomalies in the carbon-14 dates, observed by Willard Frank Libby for Egyptological samples, were in fact systematic anomalies on a global scale, represented in the carbon-14 dates of tree rings. This led to a recalibration of radiocarbon dating that was a large improvement in the accuracy. It is said that with radiocarbon dating people can determine the age accurately of a material until about 60,000 years back.

    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    With tree rings Hessel de Vries showed that assumed methods for determining the age of things could be extremely inaccurate. This shows how wrong scientists can be about their insurmountable assumptions, a small mistake and the result may change drastically. Carbon dating is the method for dating things no older than 60,000 years back.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    It doesn't take many braincells to realize that dating methods assumed to be useful for dating things much older do not have a verification method like tree rings to compare results with. The millions and billions of years found with these kind of methods do not correspond with what creationists believe to be true. Do they have a point? Skeptics offer the following explanation about the assumptions...

    source (google); Evolution? - Radiometric dating - Bas Feijen
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  28. Miracles; how life began from building blocks like atoms and molecules.

    Life doesn't arise by itself from 'dead matter'.

    There's only one observable universe.

    Hans S in reactie op tskasa1 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  29. "all I see is an argument from incredulity, which is a logical fallacy."

    Now think about what you've said; you're actually admitting that evolution is a belief!

    Hans S in reactie op tskasa1 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  30. "Hell, we even can point out around when sexual evolution started out (about 1.2 billion years ago during the Proterozoic Eon). This is hardly a gap argument, because we CAN substantiate our claims"

    Now listen to your own words, and your sentence began with the word 'Hell', and from your way of thinking that's intelligible, because it derives from the realm of darkness, also known as 'Hell'.

    · in reactie op tskasa1 (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    You really BELIEVE that sexual evolution started out about 1.2 billion years ago during "the Proterozoic Eon", and you really BELIEVE you can substantiate your claims.

    But there's one big problem; there wasn't an era called "the Proterozoic Eon"! And you know why?

    Because 'evolution' is impossible!

    google; evolution is impossible
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  31. Ah, you've called me an idiot, and that's how evolutionists always begin when they're confronted with the FACT that evolution is a RELIGION.

    And that's EXACTLY what it is: a LIE, concocted by a very intelligent PSYCHOPATH, the Bible calls Lucifer, the devil, Satan!

    Satan is trying (with great 'success') to impress not so learned people with "facts" that are not facts at all, but pure fantasy.

    · in reactie op tskasa1 (De reactie weergeven)

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    He's using deluded 'scientists' to mesmerize the masses, because they're indoctrinated through 'education' and propaganda to accept everything as fact concerning 'evolution' that's coming from 'the scientific world'.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    google; Evolution Is Biologically Impossible - Institute for Creation Research

    Evolutionists mustn't read this, for it harms their religious way of thinking.

    This is only meant for people who are not buying the doctrine called 'evolution'.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  32. I know the word 'Hell' is an expression that is used very commonly in the English language, but why?

    Because of this; As it is written, There is none righteous, no, not one Romans 3,10

    Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it. John 8,44

    Jesus=God is the highest authority.

    Hans S in reactie op tskasa1 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  33. The whole evolution vs creation debate isn't about science but about psychology and philosophy; Biblical creationists (I'm not talking about people with an unbiblical creationist conviction) accept the fact that God, through Jesus Christ has created everything according to John 1;1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2 The same was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.

    ·

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    Jesus (Christ) is 'the Word', and the Word was (and IS) God.

    They accept the Genesis account and they accept God as the righteous judge who died in their place on the cross through Jesus Christ, who rose from the dead.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    Evolutionists don't accept this, because they don't like the idea to be judged by a higher authority than themselves.

    That's the ONLY reason why they BELIEVE in 'evolution', because that's what it is; a RELIGION without accountability and judgement.

    There's only ONE person who came up with this FALSE religion; 'mr. Evil', aka Satan the devil, God's adversary.

    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 seconde geleden

    I'm NOT here to convince die-hard evolutionists, because they're trapped in their evolution-religion.

    I'm here to persuade doubters to 'give God a try'.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconden geleden

    I do realise that Satan is using die-hard evolutionists to persuade doubters to not 'give God a try'.

    Satan wants people to be lost like him, because he hates God and people, and Jesus wants to save anyone who is willing to believe in Him and His Word, aka the Bible.

    PS; keep in mind that I'm Dutch, so I'm thinking from another language than English.
    · in reactie op Hans S (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  34. Evolution is a LIE and the pope is the leader of the real church of Satan.

    one-evil.org

    vatican assassins

    Hans S in reactie op BoBtheparrot7 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  35. Calling me 'an an ACTUAL psychopath' doesn't change the fact that evolution is an INSULT to science.

    It's ABSURD, WICKED, INSANE, SATANIC and GARBAGE.

    Evolution is for fools who are asking for an eternal therapy, called the lake of fire, aka hell.

    And when criminals like you will be screaming 'JESUS IS LORD', you will realise what a moron you were by believing a satanic lie, called 'evolution'.

    Hans S in reactie op ragnarok343 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  36. My dear friend in Jesus Christ, I really believe you're wasting your time by trying to convince die-hard evolutionists of creation and God-Jesus-the Bible.

    THEY HAVE CHOSEN TO BE ANTICHRISTS!

    I turn my back on these people and I IGNORE them.

    Hans S in reactie op mdace34 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  37. Of course he's a liar, because stratovani is AN ANTICHRIST, just like the other fundamentalist evolutionists.

    They say they don't believe in the existence of God, but deep down inside they HATE HIM!!

    They're just playing games with you, and you are "their favorite fool" on this page.

    You will NOT convince any of these 'evo-fundies' of the LOVE of God, because they HATE Him.

    That's why they NEED this LIE called 'evolution'.

    Hans S in reactie op mdace34 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  38. Please, fellow believer in Jesus Christ, know the truth about Kathryn Kuhlman;

    google; Private Investigation of Alberto - Chick Publications

    Hans S in reactie op jesushealsmohamdidnt (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  39. his is sounding like the rambling of a MUSLIM FUNDIE to me, and it's the SAME tactic; 'you know nothing about islam, etc. bla bla bla'.

    Get lost with your evo-GARBAGE!

    Hans S in reactie op ragnarok343 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  40. Proverbs 26,4

    Answer not a fool according to his folly, lest thou also be like unto him.


    Proverbs 26,5

    Answer a fool according to his folly, lest he be wise in his own conceit.

    Hans S in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  41. Your picture (of the blonde with the silicon boobs) is from 'NordicDoubleHelix',

    your so called YouTube-friend.

    You can't fool me, imposter, with your multiple accounts.

    Hans S in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  42. I happen to know MORE THAN ENOUGH about islam that my VERDICT is clear; it's as SATANIC and EVIL as 'evolution' and coming from the SAME source; the Vatican!

    Hans S in reactie op ragnarok343 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  43. As an ex-believer in evolution and as an ex-atheist, it's a real PLEASURE to have forgotten most about this STINKING, FILTHY, ROTTEN VOMIT called evolution.

    It's like waking up after having had a nightmare, and gradually forgetting what the nightmare was all about, because something MUCH BETTER had replaced the memory of the nightmare; the GLORY of my LORD JESUS CHRIST, the CREATOR.

    You're too SATANIC too understand; you're trapped in this stinking lie and you've chosen to believe it.

    Hans S in reactie op ragnarok343 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  44. Is this a serious question, coming from someone with 666 in his/her username?

    the number 666 derives from the BIBLE; Here is wisdom. He who has understanding, let him calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a man. His number is six hundred sixty-six. Revelation 13:18

    It's enough for me to know what evolution is all about; GARBAGE!

    Hans S in reactie op TheMors666 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  45. Listen, big mouthed 'wise guy'; there's no place for stupid lies and insane fairy tales like 'evolution' among honest science.

    'Evolution' has nothing to do with science!

    You're the fool who's trying to defend a theory that has no scientifical substance whatsoever.

    I don't hate you, but let me be perfectly clear; I HATE EVOLUTION!

    There's only one place for this form of SATANISM; God's garbage can, aka the lake of fire.

    Hans S in reactie op ragnarok343 (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  46. Why do you pretend to be human?

    Hans S in reactie op Whiteoakdruidry (De reactie weergeven)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  47. Finally; it's really hard for you to swallow that there are people who are completely UNINTERESTED in anything you say about this subject, because YOU are the one who's lacking the intelligence and WISDOM to begin to understand that there's no such thing as 'evolution', except in the minds of degenerated people who love to be confronted with 'God's flamethrower' when HIS time of judgment has come.

    Hans S in reply to ragnarok343 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  48. coming from a person that had called me a 'bloody moron'.... >>ragnarok343 1 week ago

    Oh... well that changes everything.

    Someone should go tell domesticated dogs and broccoli that they collectively don't exist, you bloody moron.<<
    Hans S in reply to ragnarok343 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  49. Yes, and so what?

    I only gave an example of someone who is aware of the fact that the Jesuits concocted the evolution-lie.

    I didn't claim it to be a credible source, and I have other sources, but you wouldn't understand, because they're from pages of fellow believers in Jesus Christ, the person who has created you, but whom you despise and reject.

    Keep on dreaming your evolution insanity.

    Hans S in reply to tskasa1 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  50. "veer the conversation back into the realm of sanity"

    As if one can expect sanity coming from evolutionists; their brains are severely damaged...but that's the after-effect of the 'Big Bang'.

    Hans S in reply to ragnarok343 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  51. Lack of evidence?God (JESUS) has equipped you with senses and a brain to be able to KNOW about His existence; For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse. Romans 1,20

    Hans S in reply to tskasa1 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  52. Sparks - This Town Ain't Big Enough For Both Of Us

    watch?v=QAzESJ62irI

    Hans S in reply to stratovani (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  53. Ask Satan, or his representative, Whiteoakdruidry

    Wat een gezeur toch allemaal weer, mensen!

    Overigens; Nederlands vertalen naar Engels met Google vertalen, gaat heel beroerd.

    Hans S in reply to hju150 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  54. Check my site; (google) ezekiel38rapture.blogspot.nl

    I'm as Dutch as can be.

    'Barbie' is someone else.

    Hans S in reply to hju150 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  55. This is well known tactic of Satan; first he had made someone an atheist evolutionist, on his way to hell, and after he had lost this person to his enemy, JESUS, he's lying this person never belonged to him.

    The same happens with ex-muslims, who have become followers of Jesus Christ; then he's saying they never were real muslims (on their way to hell) in the first place.

    bluebottle99, YOU are the LIAR on this page!

    · in reply to bluebottle99 (Show the comment)

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    You LIE, because you LOVE to LIE and you're serving your master Satan very well, even without realising it, because Satan loves to fool around with you, because you're on your way to hell, just like him.

    That's why you think you NEED this MADNESS, called 'evolution', because you want to be your own little god in your own silly universe.

    Satan has got you by the balls!

    He's laughing at you, being one of his "USEFUL IDIOTS", just like your fellow evolutionists.
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  56. First; my name is Hans and not 'Hansy', and that's my real first name, and you call yourself 'tskasa1', which is a lie, but faking on the internet is 'normal'.

    Second; I've already put forward serious information, but evolutionsts always say; 'Oh, that's fundie christian stuff, and we don't want to know anything about it'.
    · in reply to tskasa1 (Show the comment)

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    Real science and a Biblical worldview go together very well, but you don't want to know about that, so then the conversation ends, and it turns into a confrontation, which is logical, because evolutionism and creationism are opposing views and there's NO common ground.
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  57. Proving evolution is wrong is a waste of time, because evolution doesn't exist.

    I'm here to prove that evolutionists are INSANE and SATANIC BEASTS.

    Proof nr 1; Evolutionists gather on a page like this, because they hate the title of this video; "Evolutionists Get Owned By Creationists on BBC TV Show".

    Evo's dislike getting owned by 'studid creatards', as they typify believers in Biblical creation, and so they want to prove that the title is completely wrong.
    · in reply to MISTERWHITE111 (Show the comment)

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    Seen from a anthropological and psychological standpoint, evo's are like gorilla's who are trying to scare away the "creatard monkey's" by means of macho behavior in an effort to please 'the imaginary females of science', whom they want to mate.

    They want to say to themselves; 'now this argument was do destructive to creationism, that 'the pretty and sexy females of science' are lining up to mate with me...I'm indeed a real winner, and I've every right to proclaim victory!'.
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    Now listen to this: I said in mine heart concerning the estate of the sons of men, that God might manifest them, and that they might see that they themselves are beasts. Ecclesiastes 3,18

    This verse has nothing to do with evolution, and it's by no means a confirmation of evo-madness, but it's a DEVINE observation of HUMAN ANIMALS, due to the fall of Adam and Eve and their offspring.

    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    Conclusion; evolutionists are wicked animals who can exclusively be restored by the one who has created them; JESUS CHRIST.

    There are two ways in which this restoration may take place; it can happen during their lifetime by a MIRACLE, or it will happen after they've died, because then they will be sent to an 'eternal college in hell', where they will be taught the truth about creation, but by then it will be too late for them.
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 second ago

    They will not reap the fruits of their knowledge, but they surely will proclaim one thing right; "JESUS IS LORD", is what they will be crying forever and ever, and their knees will bow, and God will not tolerate anything else coming forth from their mouths, and they will admit they were wrong and God is always right.

    In the coming future there will be no more madness called 'evolution'.

    This LIE will be completely DESTROYED, just like any other lie, concocted by Satan, and propagated by man.
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  58. My hero, JESUS Christ, is the one who will prove how wrong evolution is.

    He will not prove it through science but by using DEVINE FORCE.

    He will simply kill all of His enemies....ALL OF THEM!

    And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.
    · in reply to MISTERWHITE111 (Show the comment)

    Hans S

    Hans S 1 second ago

    21 And the remnant were slain with the sword of him that sat upon the horse, which sword proceeded out of his mouth: and all the fowls were filled with their flesh. Revelation 19;20-21

    BUT...He's still merciful and there's still time to repent.

    Jesus will disprove evolution (and all lies) through the outcome of the Biblical prophesies concerning the end time.

    The stage is set for the end time!
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  59. Are you still having problems with my name?

    google; Evolution? - Fact... or Fiction? - Bas Feijen

    A GREAT read!

    Hans S in reply to tskasa1 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  60. What One Famous Scientist Said About Evolution  "One morning I woke up and something had happened in the night, and it struck me that I had been working on this [evolution] stuff for twenty years and there was not one thing I knew about it. That's quite a shock to learn that one can be so misled so long. Either there was something wrong with me or there was something wrong with evolutionary theory. Naturally, I know there is nothing wrong with me ....."

    · in reply to ComAntNeLib
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 minutes ago

    "[The] question is: Can you tell me anything you KNOW about Evolution? Any one thing? Any one thing that is true? I tried that question on the geology staff at the Field Museum of Natural History and the only answer I got was silence. I tried it on the members of the Evolutionary Morphology Seminar in the University of Chicago, a very prestigious body of Evolutionists, and all I got there was silence for a long time, and eventually one person said,
    · in reply to Hans S
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 minute ago

    "I do know one thing - it ought not to be taught in high school"."

    Part of a keynote address given at the American Museum of Natural History by Dr Colin Patterson (Senior Palaeontologist, British Museum of Natural History, London) in 1981. Unpublished transcript.
    · in reply to Hans S

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  61. Believing the theory of evolution as a fact has destroyed the spiritual lives of countless Christians. This must be addressed.

    The promulgation of evolution as an indisputable fact in schools, universities, and through the media, has prevented many people from accepting the salvation of Jesus Christ. This veil must be torn down.

    The following is a true story that embodies why I serve God in the fight against the theory of evolution.
    · in reply to MISTERWHITE111
    Hans S

    Hans S 3 minutes ago

    It is very close to the experience of one of the members of my family who attended theological college.  At Paul Kanamori's school in Japan, one of the boys found a Bible. He read it without the help of a missionary or a commentary and was fascinated by what he read. As a result of his reading of the bible he was converted to Jesus Christ. He let other boys in his school read the bible because he couldn't keep the good news to himself.
    · in reply to Hans S
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 minutes ago

    Many others were converted, including Kanamori, and their number grew to 100 thirteen to eighteen year olds. All this was achieved without the assistance of any adult bible teachers. Because of their joy, they took the good news of their salvation with them into the market place, but they were severely persecuted. Kanamori eventually took over the leadership of the group, but he was put in prison.
    · in reply to Hans S
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 minute ago

    He took with him his gospels of Matthew and John which he hid in the inner lining of his waistcoat. They were not found when he was searched. On his release from prison, he went to theological college to become a pastor. There he was taught to interpret the bible using the theories of Higher Criticism. He was taught that the Bible was only a collection of Babylonian myths and legends; that there was no creator; that humans evolved;
    · in reply to Hans S
    Hans S

    Hans S 15 seconds ago

    that God did not revealed his truth to the Old Testament prophets; that religion merely evolved; and that the resurrection did not happen. Despite the great strength that he developed during his period of persecution, the subtle deception taught at college caused him to lose his faith. For 24 years he continued in the darkness of unbelief until tragedy struck. His wife whom he greatly loved died, leaving him with his nine children to look after. He was shattered.
    · in reply to Hans S

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    Then he remembered the Scriptures that he had learnt in his youth. He remembered, 'I am the resurrection and the life, says the Lord. He who believes on me, though he were dead, yet shall he live.' He re-dedicated his life and returned to his Saviour, Jesus. His old joy returned, and his eyes were opened to the clever deceptions that had led him astray.
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    The same Higher Criticism is taught today in most theological colleges. It is compulsory for most who train to become preachers.

    (After a section in E.K. Victor Pearce (1993), "Weighing the Evidence", Alpha (an imprint of Scripture Press Foundation Ltd): Bucks (UK) p:72)
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  62. Does Evolution contradict the Bible?

    google; Does Evolution contradict the Bible? | Bibleinfo com

    Hans S in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  63. The probability that evolution has

    occurred
    has been calculated to be

    equivalent to the chance that

    a tornado will assemble a

    fully functional Boeing 747

    from the rubbish it picks

    up from a junkyard.

    (stated by world-renowned cosmologist & mathematician, Sir Fred Hoyle)

    Hans S

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  64. The Brontosaurus Never Existed And 49 Other Science Misconceptions Will Make You Less Dumb

    50 Science Misconceptions - mental_floss on YouTube (Ep.18)

    watch?v=LqaDf2fuUH8#at=444

    Hans S

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  65. For one specific protein molecule

    of 100 amino acids long to have

    evolved by chance,

    10²° light years

    a mass of unsuitable proteins,

    forming a cube 100 billion

    billion light years across,

    would have to be

    created as well.

    Hans S

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  66. "they corrected their mistake pretty damn quickly after that too"

    The Brontosaurus story began way back in 1874. A man called Othniel Charles Marsh discovered, in Wyoming, USA, the most complete dinosaur skeleton that had ever, up to that time, been unearthed.

    We now know that it was an Apatosaurus - we also know that it was headless! However, in order to present a complete skeleton to the scientific community,
    · in reply to tskasa1 (Show the comment)

    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    Marsh "Borrowed" the head from a completely different dinosaur - a Camarasurus - which he had found some four miles away, and cobbled the disparate parts together. He then presented his hybrid in a scientific paper, heralding it as a completely new dinosaur - The Brontosaurus!

    The scientific community were completely taken in - how could they not be? - Did Marsh not have a full Brontosaurus skeleton as evidence?
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 second ago

    So Marsh was lauded as a paleontological hero and the Brontosaurus went on to become one of the most instantly recognisable dinosaurs of all.

    The Brontosaurus is Busted - Slowly.

    By 1903, the game was largely up. Scientists by now were aware (largely due to the work of another paleontologist, Elmer Riggs), that the Brontosaurus was actually an Apatosaurus with the head of a Camarasaurus.

    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 1 second ago

    This information however, never seemed reluctant to escape it's own little scientific circle. The name of Brontosaurus continued to be used by Museums and the name was not formally removed from Paleontology records and textbooks until 1974 and the Brontosaurus exhibit at the Carnegie Museum finally received it's correct head in 1979.
    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    This low-level, some would say stealthy, changing of information, left the majority of the people outside of the scientific community unaware that the Brontosaurus had never existed. Indeed, in 1989, the US Postal service issued a set of four stamps featuring Dinosaurs: Tyranosaurus, Pterandon, Stegosaurus and - You guessed it - Brontosaurus!

    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)
    Hans S

    Hans S 2 seconds ago

    There was a media outcry, with the press accusing the post office of "fostering scientific illiteracy" by not checking for scientific accuracy before publishing, and there were demands that the stamps be recalled.

    Bye Bye Brontosaurus - Hello Apatosaurus.

    Although the Brontosaurus is no longer with us, the skeleton that started it all is. It continues to be displayed at the prestigeous Peabody Museum of Natural History at Yale University in the USA.

    · in reply to Hans S (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  67. Read this madness from the pro-evolution Wikepedia on 'abiogenesis'; "Often brought up in the origins debate is how evolution does not explain the origin of life. Let's get something abundantly clear: abiogenesis and evolution are two completely different things. The theory of evolution says absolutely nothing about the origin of life. It merely describes the processes which take place once life has started up."

    But life didn't start up by itself and without the creator, JESUS Christ!

    Hans S

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  68. Jesus died, and He rose from the dead, and He ascended into heaven.

    He isn't just a good dude; He's our creator* and the only one who can save us.

    You're right about religion, and Jesus didn't start a religion, but He started a relationship between Him and people.

    The Roman Catholic cult started a religion called 'christianity', which has nothing in common with the teachings of Jesus.

    * In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. John 1;1 - Jesus is the Word.

    Hans S in reply to henftw (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  69. Just look around you, with eyes, made by the creator, JESUS Christ, and analyse it with your brain, made by the creator, JESUS Christ.

    For the invisible things of him since the creation of the world are clearly seen, being perceived through the things that are made, even his everlasting power and divinity; that they may be without excuse. Romans 1,20 World English Bible

    Hans S in reply to tskasa1 (Show the comment)

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen
  70. +TONY COSTANZO
    Amen: evolution is BULL SHIT!

    rcagamaz
    2:21 PM




    +Hans S
    bible is bullshit
    Hans S
    2:31 PM




    +rcagamaz
    And this remark will send you straight to the lake of fire, God's garbage can for satanic idiots.

    BeantwoordenVerwijderen

Zie: HTML-tags in reacties toepassen en open met deze link een nieuw tabblad of nieuwe pagina om de aanwijzingen te kunnen raadplegen.